My Approach to Project Analysis: Observations and Reflections

Over time, I have developed a method of analysis that helps me navigate investment evaluations. It is not a set of rigid rules or a magic formula—simply the approach I use and decided to share.

Two Different Scenarios: Known vs Unknown

My approach changes depending on how much information is available about the administration.

When the Administration Is Known

If I have observed an administrator’s work in the past, this experience becomes a reference point. It doesn’t eliminate risks, but it provides a base for evaluation.

I focus on:

• How the admin behaves compared to past patterns
• Whether they remain consistent or change strategy
• Which stage of the project’s lifecycle they are in

Even experienced admins can make mistakes or change approach, so I always stay attentive.

When the Administration Is Unknown

When the admin is unknown, I rely entirely on the project’s own features.

Key checks:

• Technical quality: well-built website, original design vs. cheap templates with copied text
• Documentation: clear explanations, useful materials (videos, PDFs), FAQs that actually answer questions
• Basic security: SSL certificate, DDoS protection, domain age

⚠️ Even with good analysis, no project is ever free of risks.

Analyzing Investment Plans

Sustainability

I always check the balance between net profit and duration.

For unknown admins: I prefer projects around 1% daily profit. In rare cases, I may consider up to 1.5%.

For known admins: I can make exceptions, depending on past track record.

Quick calculation: Net profit ÷ plan duration (days) = average daily profit.

Referral System

Referral bonuses that are too high (over 5% on the first level) always raise concerns, especially if combined with other risk factors.

Project Development Patterns

Beyond plans and referrals, I also evaluate how the project’s growth is managed.

Growth Approach

• How initial deposit limits are handled
• Whether promotions are moderate or aggressive in early phases
• Listing strategy (starting with niche monitors or going broad too soon)

Communication

I also check the project’s online presence: consistent communication, use of social channels or Telegram, and whether the approach looks long-term or short-term oriented.

My Decision Process

With known admins: the process is faster, as I already have references and past observations to rely on.

With unknown admins: I follow a more structured evaluation and usually base my decisions on the signals I observe. If too many red flags emerge, I avoid the project.

Final Considerations

This is the method I use: not infallible, but useful to give structure when evaluating projects in a sector where information is often limited.

The most important lesson I’ve learned is flexibility: what works in one situation may not apply in another, and adapting often makes the difference.

These are personal reflections developed over time. Each project requires its own evaluation, and every investment carries risk.